Equal Rights, Brochure 3
by Hans Georg Lanzendorfer
… the woman however is a reflection of the man (1st Corinthians 11:7)
… because, the man was not created for the woman's sake, but rather the woman for the man's sake (1st Corinthians 11:9)
or
… the neglected and suppressed equivalence and equal rights of man and woman
https://creationaltruth.org/FIGU/Overpopulation/Equal-Rights/Equal-Rights-Brochure-3
The equal rights and the equivalence of man and woman are modern meanwhile in the western world at the very least often purely theoretically in legal transcripts becomes an officially recognized self-evident fact. Unfortunately these legally guaranteed equal rights however still not for a long time find the complete application, as this the women e.g. get the feeling in still always worse paid wages than the men for the same duty etc. The fight around these legally founded equal rights in civilized countries and states, that nevertheless often unfortunately insist first on the paper, for a long time however woman-suppressing and woman-discriminating have, sociological-cultural tradition behind itself. It is this suppression, abasement, degradation and discrimination of the women, which often still today by which the suppression affirming and implementing elements are vehemently denied and contentiously become as non-existent. This as a rule from out of the simple reason, since that such things discriminating thought, deed and action are mostly based on old and belief-conditional, religious perceptions of the society; bounded in cult-religions ways of thinking, which by the concerned blind-believer human beings simply are not with the necessary criticism looked at, analyzed and questioned.
That for necessary equivalence and equal rights and this issue accepting new time thinking, the esteem as well as the women being entitled honor bestowal and the real deed and action in accordance with the again in a new form official and natural laws of the equivalence of the genders, that naturally the old unhuman and unnatural cult-religions' law formations of the new time always more go against, must however primarily in the heads of the human beings themselves take place, be recognized and lived. Many-fold live on the Earth however still many human beings, women like men and entire people-masses themselves, who often still are imprisoned in irrational religious or other unnatural and contrary to the creational rules of behavior, directives, morality rules, ideals, ideas, theologies, irrational teachings, sect teachings, political or religious dogmas or doctrines of all kinds etc., and so forth, that one prevents equal rights and equivalence of the women in the society in the earth-legal-natural and creational-law-based sense strictly speaking by their ways of thinking.
Surprisingly there are also today still great amounts of religious cult-believer women, younger and older, who have fallen into their role as 'female subservient' of the men and themselves simply indiscriminately accept this condition in their delusion as the 'Will of God' .
The naturally given equivalence or the earth-legal equal rights of the genders as well as the equality and the emancipation in the sense of the equality of man and woman, therefore also the equality, the equal chances, the demand for equality, the striving for equality, the being equal, the equal status and the mutual esteem and honor bestowal as man and woman, as logical Ur-principles of the Creation and the nature should actually be established also in the Ur-works of the western Christian influenced cultural circles, and thereby also in the Bible and in the New Testament. This is however in no kind and wise the case, which entirely clearly and precisely proves, that this alleged 'holy' machination of 'god's mercy' does not correspond to the natural and creational laws, but rather entirely simply arose from some human brains. Written down ideas, imaginations and wishes of those led into the unreal, who attempt through confused illusions and every now and then also sexual delusions since time immemorial, to themselves make the fellow human beings, men, children and women, their subservients. Entirely especially this is better visible in the case of the suppression of the women; because it is not only clearer evidence on the equivalence and the equal rights or the equality of man and woman in this existing text, which forms a great and long-range terrestrial culture. That is why this Christian-religious tradition better, called 'holy scripture', can be looked at as one of the greatest and most terrible causes of discrimination of women since time immemorial. No less exists naturally still many other woman-discriminating religious texts, as e.g. the Qur'an, of which here however the speech shall not be.
We live in a western and Christian influenced culture, that the human beings look at as very highly civilized and of which he/she blinded believes, that in this some of the best, most humanistic and fair laws are worked out, which all human beings, independent of their gender or their race affiliation, secures an absolute equality and equal treatment in all concerns. It is determined in the today's time in different concerns thus, however in the determining and for the cohabitation of the human beings in a social community as well as for the society that does not apply very important principles, rules of order, rules and laws. Entirely especially in the realm of the equal rights of man and woman very conflicting legislations between state and religious cultures of belief clash with one another.
There is this very salient contrariness, that does not simply let itself vacate with succinct pretexts and excuses from the way. Thus stands e.g. the pure worldly legislations, like state- and federal-constitutions or civil codes, in the blatant contradiction to the often since thousands of years handed down laws and recommendations of a determined civilization. The necessary and already in many concerns splitting of church and state comes here often much better to the expression above all in the equal rights of the genders and thereby in the equal rights of man and woman.
In discussions, talks and confrontations on this topic with persons from religious and so-called worldly circles, in which representatives of worldly legislations as per federal- or state-constitutions, criminal codes or civil codes confront the representatives of religious behavior norms as per godly/divine recommendations, dogmas and laws (e.g. from the Bible or the New Testament), is often attempted by the Christian believers, through distortions, transformations, wrong-interpretations, new adaptations, interpretations and alterations etc. to bring the religious teachings of both the absolutely contrary and the legislative texts within the society to a common denominator. This contradiction and agreement attempt is an example of different articles of the Swiss civil code (see e.g. “the effect of the marriage in general ZGB art. 159 to 180 ff.”) in comparison with the so-called 'holy text' of the Christianity to recognize and with absolute certainty do not at all agree with each other, because the so-called 'holy' legislation of the Christianity is a legislation, that itself since its existence the entirely obviously over and over again and partially in absolute ausgearteten forms imposed against the equal rights of the woman and against the recognition of the woman, whereby the woman is denied, being an equivalent human being to the man. A fact, that still has validity today, as this proves the quite known forms of the woman-discriminating machinations at worldwide level.
For rationality-talented, thinking and inquiring human beings has in the today's time increased the important question according to, wherein then basically the causes of that lie hidden, which in the course of the hundreds and thousands of years led to the absolute unequality and unequal value of the two genders, therefore of man and woman. This is however for open and thinking human beings of the new time for a long time no longer secret, because this for a long time has been exposed: In fact it was always already in the Christian religion and in the Christian thinking, and indeed since the ur-beginning on, which depicted woman as temptress of the man. She was and is still today considered as the stained temptress, that threatens the man with her seductive charms, her sensuality and her lasciviousness bears in temptation, whereby she allegedly dissuades him from his right ways.
Since time immemorial the teachers of religion, the priests and the believers taught us, that it had been Eva (Eve), who deceived Adam with her flattering art of persuasion to bite into the apple as well as for the blame and consequently for the case of sins (fall of Man) and for the exclusion from the paradise. Hence Eva (Eve) bore the blame for it, that the humankind today stands at a point, on which it has to fight with uncounted disastrous things and Ausartungen. Would the history have been, in accordance with Christian speculation, after Adam proceeded, that probably in his male superiority and deliberateness as well as in his outstanding chastity and in his unquestionable noble belief in the alleged all-mighty one, the God of Love, would have never taken hold of the apple, then on our earth world would today prevail in the Elysian states - logically. The paradise would be without the female art of seduction still today of the human beings' homeland. How can and could it therefore the Bible and the New Testament in the afterwards, look at a female Wesen as the man's equal, equivalent or of equal rights! A female Wesen, who with such difficult man-enticing vices, of the sin is fully, impurely inflicted and is stained.
Since time immemorial the woman was only in accordance with Christian thinking created for this, in order to be subservient to the man and to his Will and in order to him, the master, be servilely useful, satisfy and quietly, indiscriminating and respectful, in order to submissively carry out to him performing his will. Surely, there some few and of the female gender exist in minimum form rehabilitating evidences, in the New Testament, that encourages the man, to love the female Wesen. The undisputed quintessence of all verses and evidences practically of all 'holy scriptures' however, record and order the woman to a role of the bondage, inferiority, the subservience and the lack of independence. The woman is degraded to a human Wesen, who without the man absolutely no one's own decisions are able to meet, because after all the woman is indeed only a more dependent reflection of the man (see New Testament 1st Cor. 11:7).
To this topic more probably were already penned a variety of books and equally many confrontations and vindications originated from Christian and many other circles, who attempt to justify and whitewash the women-suppressing laws and recommendations with their specious and unlogical arguments and objections.
If this discrimination of women and suppression of women however were not written down and perpetuated in the so-called 'holy, all-good and benevolent texts' in thus unclear and unlogical forms, which are able to trigger innumerable controversies, but rather in a clear language and with the precise evidence on which absolute and creation-law-based equivalence and equal rights of the genders, then further woman-defaming books would never be penned and also would never lead to the discussions for this. Now again with certainty arguments awaken from the circles of all religions, which thereon attempt to point out, that at the time that the 'holy scriptures' were written, barbaric times prevailed and the 'texts and words of God' in that kind of language had to be written, because allegedly the human beings understood no other language, etc.
The ur-eternal efficacy of the laws of nature, that in more unrestricted kind and wise speak of the application and explanation of equivalence and the equal rights of woman and man, has since thousands of millions of years its full validity and is at the very least in this universe around many thousands of millions of years older, than the many cult religions. The religions however have re-invented the laws of nature concerning the equivalence of the genders and amended based on human wishful thinking. These religions exist with their laws and recommendations first since a few thousand years, however they have indubitably done much harm, and indeed not only regarding the devaluation and exploitation of the woman. Hundreds and thousands of justifications themselves are not able to excuse this fact.
Pacifications by not thinking and not acting and as a consequence the accepting of discrimination of women or out of unknowledge simply approving of religion-followers are no longer able to dissuade the thinking and rationality-talented human beings of the new time from that, which the real backgrounds and causes of discrimination of women are to be sought in the religions and in their basic principles as the causing factors.
In order to substantiate these serious claims, itself leaves not thereon to renounce, e.g., some of the proof and most meaningful assertions of the Bible and New Testament verses approach and on its woman-discriminating contents more accurately analyze.
It cannot be resented by the religiously influenced antagonists, who themselves stand against the natural and state-legal legislations, that they as believer confused human beings drive up certain Biblical passages, which indicate a religiously interpreted and laid out equal rights, as this in the new time the worldly legislations always more demand the equal rights of the woman. Accurately look at such 'holy' text passages read in New Testament e.g. just like so:
New Testament Ephesians. 5, verse 28:
Thus the men (husbands) have the duty, to love their women (wives) as their own bodies. Whoever loves his woman (wife), that loves himself.
Out of such verses lets oneself recognize quite a smaller evidence, which thereon appears to indicate, that the women still bear more value in themselves and are worthy of an equal treatment in love by the man. It may regarding this however not let be except respect that in the further verses of these New Testament Ephesian letters, which allegedly were drafted and written down by Paul, stands, that the women are subservient to the man: an entirely clear and precise suppression effect itself up to today: A demand of subservience, a demand for lack of independence and a denial of self-responsibility, whereby an inferiority of the woman comes about in relation to the man. Thus stands written in the verses 22 and 23 as follows:
New Testament Ephesians. 5, verse 22:
You women (wives), are subservient to your men (husbands) as to the Lord.
Ephesians. 5, verse 23:
Because the man (husband) is the head of the woman (wife).
In the Christian history begins the evidences of the suppression, inferiority speaking and alleged second-ratedness of the women but already much more previously, therefore namely already in the Biblical time allegedly approximately 3500 years ago, then after all the woman was created out of the noble rib of the Adam and not something reversed. Thus this history is for everyone to look up in the Bible (wrongly called the Old Testament), in the 1st Book of Moses 2:22.
1st Book of Moses (Genesis) 2:22
And God the Lord built a woman from the rib, which he had taken from the human beings (Adam), and led her to the human beings.
From this point in time on moves itself the indescribable and lasting for thousands of years suffering way of the women all over through the two 'holy' texts and the therefrom influenced history of the Christianity. Thus in this 'holy book' (Bible and New Testament), is the written work of the alleged godly/divine benevolence, the kindheartedness, the love, forgiveness and the love for the next one, in over nine hundred sentence locations in histories, letters, laws or in evidences on behavior directives in demeaning form that speaks of women (Weibern) and women (Frauen). Women (Frauen), who either married, patronized, divorced, stoned, banished, outcast, as slaves will be sold or bought. There is talk of unsolicited women, who hers and for her selected men bear children; of women, who as widows of no more value and as disgrace of the temptation or as whores of the man's world are cast into the unfortune etc.
The all-mighty, love of the next one and equality proclaiming God has given Moses in his 'godly/divine messages' his own human value measuring stick for the human beings of the Earth; a measuring stick, with which he measures his own, human creations after his specifically defined value. Entirely clearly he states as alleged father of the human beings also here his preferred creation form and his preference for an entirely determined human Creation-form, the man (see Bible).
3rd Book of Moses (Leviticus) 27:3 forward
… thus you shall value the man between the twentieth and sixtieth year at fifty lot silver after holy weight.
If it is however a woman, thus your valuation shall amount to thirty lot silver.
If it is a person between the fifth and the twentieth year, thus you shall value them at twenty lot silver, if they are male; if female, at ten lot silver.
If it is a child between one month and five years, then you are to value them at five lot silver, if they are a boy; if a girl, at three lot silver.
Before god all human beings are equal, one must however believe, or perhaps however not entirely…?
In seven passages of the Elberfeld-translation of the Bible is in addition the talk of divorce papers, that with a divorce of the married people is to be given by the man to the rejected and outcast women (wives) for their further way of life. In all these seven text passages it is however always the men, who to their weary becoming women (wives) issued divorce papers and thereby entirely legally send the women (wives) into the desert. Not a single time and in no concrete to the man referred case are the divorce papers handed out by a woman (wife) to a man.
The man had to always already determine over the woman (wife), and indeed in every situation in life, thus in every case the Christian teaching wants to make one believe through its apparent wisdom, make-believe and apparent love of the human beings. Thus the man has e.g. also the absolute right of determination over the growing up child in the body of the woman (wife) during her pregnancy (see Bible).
2nd Book of Moses (Exodus) 21:22
When men fight with each other and they harm a pregnant woman (Wieb), thus that a miscarriage occurs, however no further damages comes about, therefore it shall be paid for with money; which the husband imposes on the offender, who shall give this for the abortion.
The physical and psychical pains, the woman (wife) has to sustain in the course of this, will hardly i.e. overall not be considered, because the damage suffering Psyche and physical of the woman (wife) will in the course of this not be looked at as more considerable or more worth mentioning; moreover the woman (wife) also herself does not have the value for her lost child established or to decide about it, because she is looked at as inferior probably indeed appears entirely to not be capable, to determine an amount.
The Revelations of John, written down in the New Testament, gives then already entirely clearly and thoroughly in detail information about this concern, that insults a woman fundamentally as stained or as impure. Then how could otherwise in this revelation such a more misogynistic, more woman-befouling und more woman-discriminatory verse, allegedly drafted and written down by an apostle John, to be found, which here reads:
New Testament Revelation 14:4
These are they, who have not stained themselves with women, because they are virgin pure.
It appears entirely obvious here in the prologue of this verse to have given chosen and initially virgin pure human beings, who then in their latter dealing with the women were impure or just stained. Were this not so, then would indeed exist also in this verse no mention of remaining virgin and pure. Conclusion: The dealing with women stains and makes the pure men impure.
To this woman-despising line continued the alleged predecessor and founder of the today's papacy, namely Peter personally, in his misogynistic convictions and struck thereby pointing the way to a contrary to nature change, that still is proclaimed today in papal circles and through the today's god-representative on Earth.
New Testament 1st Peter letter 3:1
Equally, you women, be subservient to your men…
In the letter to Timothy is then in circles of the men with an entirely precise language and convictions regulated the determination of the women. Thus speaks then also allegedly Paul himself to Timothy with the following woman-scornful and woman-opinion-ignoring words:
New Testament 1st Timothy 2:11-forward
A woman learns quietly in all subordination. To teach however I do not allow a woman, also not, to raise herself over the man, but rather I command her, herself quietly to react. Because Adam was created first, thereafter Eva (Eve).
In a further letter to the Colossians in the New Testament returns Paul again to his more hostile convictions and demand of subservience concerning the women. A view, which he wanted to publish in a letter also to the Colossians, with the words:
New Testament 1st Colossians 3:18
You women (wives), be subservient to your men (husbands), as oneself is entitled to in the Lord!
To the completion of this pointing out of the Christian influenced thinking and the convictions concerning equal rights and equivalence of the genders, still briefly shall the letter (epistle) to the Ephesians come to the speech, wherein it then reads:
New Testament Ephesians 5:33
However also among every individual you shall thus love your woman (wife), as yourself, the woman (wife) however shall have deference before the men.
With no single word do the New Testament scribes find it anywhere of value to mention or write, how it then stands with the deference of the man toward the woman (wife). This deference toward the woman (wife) does not appear to be necessarily necessary, because after all the man has firstly even himself to love and in accordance with and after this, his ego-love, then is also to love the woman (wife).
Probably the man is looked at as too noble by these scribes, as that this first on this interest of the honor bestowal had to be indicated toward his woman (wife), because after all the man is indeed the master and thereby the woman (wife) superordinate; which he should indeed know automatically. A woman (wife) however cannot apparently recognize this deference out of one's own thought-work and power, because she shall indeed let herself be tutored and indiscriminating be led by the man; how can she therefore also in these concerns already herself be more knowing than the man. How can moreover an inferior creature, like the woman (wife) this in accordance with all defamations illustrated, still without being asked and does not thereon perceive in a fine-fluidal wise the indicated deference, since she however already since her first creation from the rib of Adam has obsessed by sin and the fateful apple that the man has been judged, whereby this firstly took damage, after he had without woman lived before in innocence.
At this place however to approach still further the many different quotations from the verses and text passages of the Bible or the New Testaments and examine these for their extremely women-discriminating and women-suppressing contents, would lead too far and would fill a further book on this topic. Therefore I leave it hereby with the jewel of the causes for all thinking and searching human beings, as an unoverlookable evidence thereon, that one of the greatest causes of the discrimination of the female gender on our Earth for thousands of years lies in the hypocritical religious traditions and teachings.
It is entirely obvious worldwide, together with the western, Christian influenced cultural circle, in the further to recognize also, that the women in the different cultures played entirely different rolls and also were and are entirely differently 'valued' or of 'equal rights'. Thus cultures exist, in which the matriarchy reigns and the women as owners of all tracts of land, houses and goods of a family or a community, a kinship or entire people have assumed the absolute guiding role. To the opposite stands as patriarchy the male dominance, as this is not only in western cultures determining for thousands of years. This contrariness in the dealings with the genders and their rolls shows at its root much better causality between the thinking and to the from this rising up cultural property with the different cultural techniques, which naturally in turn through the thinking of the in the culture living human beings will be formed, lived and used.
All these different cultures have themselves worldwide their own rites, laws, directives etc., through their own thinking thought up, formed and created. Every single one of these cultures goes out mistakenly thereon, to go the right way, because the tradition or the age-old handed down knowledge conceived however allegedly from it, which it always already thus was and hence therefore must be better.
There are many-fold however of the age-old traditions, through which the women in the most different cultural circles often neglects, suppresses or mutilates in terms of feet or gender parts etc., and indeed only for reasons of the tradition or out of religious imaginations. But the age-old traditions of all civilizations, kinships and peoples etc., do not justify it, that suppress women, to look at and to value as naive and dependent on men or as valueless and without any dignity and as more inferior than one of the human beings compared to a smaller animal, as this is still very often the case and to be observed in religious-fanatical states unfortunately today. As for the present time now the time has finally come, in order to put an end to such inhumane traditions, which in the greatest majority are only conducted by megalomaniacal men.
We human beings are all an important and conscious part of the Earth contributing to the fate of this world. Our small world, our planet is but in turn only a minute small part of the enormous universe. It is part of an enormous Creation with all its innumerable laws, rules, behavior guides and directives. Natural laws and natural directives, which by the Creation will be exemplified in the nature itself more visible for the human beings of this Creation. These laws of nature reveal to all impartial human beings also the natural correlations between man and woman. Within these laws of nature and principles and thereby within the Creation no single Wesen, and be it still so small, from one another, from a stronger, greater in more humility-demanding kind and wise is suppressed or looked at as more inferior or more unimportant. Precisely that demands however creation-wide neither the female principle from the male nor the male principle from the female. All life-forms and every still so small life-form, and be it also still so microscopically small, has to fulfil its entirely determined and consciously by the Creation thought up task in the cycle of the development and the evolution. None is more or less value than the others. Therefore entirely determined tasks can only be taken on by the life forms intended and designated for it; tasks and forms of determination, that consequently cannot simply be replaced by any other Wesen. This law has its validity in the microcosm as also on a large scale. Thus this has naturally seen also its determination in the regard to the human beings, so therefore also in the rolls of man and woman. What principle is now however more important in the nature, and what bears a more valueful task in itself? This is a question, which the human being is not able to answer him/herself in the form of a question, while he/she ascribes to one of the two poles, the negative or positive, a more important or inferior role than the others. Therefore the value is always the same, no matter, whether the principle the woman, the female, as the bearing one of new life, or whether it is the man, who contributes the seed for this, in order to inseminate a female egg cell, from which the then new life can originate.
This question can very simply be answered at its root through the observation of nature. Here the nature has entirely targeted all thought up and created life, through its own consciousness, and indeed each of its various creatures and creations of both kinds of gender, and so therefore a male and a female principle, thus the life forms of both genders form a creation-given symbiosis, in order for their task of the Creation evolution and the reproduction within the framework of the laws of the Creation and through the Creation and therewith this to be righteous to themselves. Not one of the both poles, neither solely alone the female nor solely alone the male, can survive without the other principle, i.e. gender. Him/Herself when a survival of the individual for a determined time or a determined period of life would be ascertained, thus the reproduction, the development and the evolution entirely could be seen no more to function without the opposite pole of the other-gendered one.
If the nature and its mode of function is approached as comparison for the human beings as an example for equivalence of man and woman, then this means, that an indescribable arrogance and a contempt by the human beings occurs toward the laws of nature, by which a life-form discriminates and the man over the woman or the woman over the man is placed, in order for one or other's form through an unlogical and contrary to the creational volition mode of thinking to assign or to impute to an inferior or higher value. Human beings, who do such, recognize neither the nature nor the human beings, nor the respect or the deference of the life and the evolution.
It is an absolute natural given law that the female and the male, therefore woman and man, in their values are completely equivalent. Therefore that means, that in the equality and equal rights absolutely no differentiations may come to light, which would make one form better, higher, more noble, more important, more senseful or more valueful than the other. From out of these natural reasons considered, it is an absolute human presumptuousness, when the one life form, the female or the male, debases under the other or the other one in contrary to nature form is raised up. Man and woman are in the natural occurrences and concerns as part of a universal plan and whole in the sense of the natural development and evolution collective ordered in the same fulfillment obtainment. Man or woman has therein fully all around same rights and duties to fulfill, also as source of new life, with which a differentiation, that it this fulfillment either as man, so therefore as procreating principle, or however as woman (Frau), in more venerable form also called woman (Weib), to fulfill as the receiving and bearing principle.
Thereby an equality is given in all things and in all concerns of the human life and all existences on this world. This equality is by the human beings also referred to as equal rights. A word-value, which indeed a certain correctness possesses, however in the specific value a more precise investigation must be undergone.
The emancipation in its correct significance is an equality in a conscious mutual recognition, which more accurately says, that the equality and equal rights discerningly and consciously must find its application and that as a result that one form, thus either the female or the male, does not stand lower or higher than the other. This correlates itself in particular to the marriage, to the long-term relationship, i.e. life-partnership, with which both genders, man and woman, in community under the control of a formation of equality, in the sense of the equal doings and of the equal rights. Consequently therefore in every respect the man in the marriage has to concede to the woman (wife) the precise same rights and tasks, as this must also be the case on the part of the woman (wife) towards to the man. This means, that the two partners in the value of the marriage, i.e., marital community quantum-based have the same duties to fulfill and the same rights, only that these in their form itself are distinguished by the naturally determined conditions of one another. Therefore the man cannot now even take the place of a nature-given to an infant or a suckling child towards the natural role of the mother, who e.g. in her natural duty is able to satisfy the child at her breast. An example, through which is recognized, that there are natural rights of the two genders, which nature-based are not 'equal rights', i.e., of equality. The man is not able satisfy the child at his chest, and he also cannot replace the maternal nearness, love and care, as this precisely only a mother is able to do. The man has no maternal instinct, but rather that of the father to whom now even by the nature a certain variability is given to the mother. If this were not so, then the Creation or the nature itself would not need to make the work for the creation of the twofoldness, thus precisely of the positive and negative. The principle of the bearing one is to the human beings given by the nature on the planet Earth just to the female part, thus only the woman (Frau), i.e., the woman (Weib) as her entirely one's own right, therefore only she is able to bear the offspring. This is the form of the human beings of this Earth, therefore only the woman (Frau), i.e., the woman (Weib) is entitled the right to be regarded as the 'source of the life'. The man however has thereby as father and maker of the child definitely to share his to him awarded part in the care around the child as well as the woman, however always in his natural role of the father, of the male. Both parents therefore collectively fulfill a very important function in the upbringing of the descendants, and neither of the two is holistically to be seen more important or more unimportant, more valueful or inferior in the care, protection and upbringing of the child. Therefore then from this results in the recognition of the equality and equivalence, which here means, that it must be recognized, that both partners, the woman like the man, in togetherness apply their performance of duties, which they mutually and indeed depending upon their form have to fulfill.
When therefore the one part in a community has to fulfill its duty, e.g., the maternal duty with all its arising and specific duties, then also the other part has, precisely the man, to fulfill the fatherly duty, like e.g. an earning of the subsistence together with all other duties, that often in interaction step into appearance. None of the resulting duties and work, however they also always will be divided or assigned by the two partners, is however classified inferior, because any work in the community contributes its very important value to the preservation of the community. Thus everything therefore occurs in mutual oneness, as this for example also for itself goes with the procreation of descendants.
Nature has placed it thus into its regulations, that with a sexual act for procreation of the descendant the man as 'procreating one', as positive-principle, thereby fulfills his natural duty and his natural right, which he as the 'giving one', as the inseminating part in the natural principle of the interaction with his woman (wife) has sexual intercourse and in her growing up and ripened ovum precisely fertilized through his sperm delivered to the woman (wife). The woman (wife),/span> in turn has in the course of this to fulfill her nature-given performance of duties and her right after descendant procreation, with the male sperm delivered to the fertilized egg she develops it in her body and after nine months pregnancy bears the growing child.
This is a natural and Creation-law-based symbiosis of the life-form human being, whereby the two partners in equality and performance of duties live and fulfill the nature-given oneness. A fact, that is to be changed by nothing and also still therefore cannot be changed by strong and wrongly-understood emancipation imaginations.
The example of the procreation of descendants, as this was conceived by the nature, exhibits precisely in, that only through the absolute equivalence of the two genders can the evolution go its way; and precisely that itself must be reflected in the entire every day and in the life of the society as well as in the consciousness of the human beings, of the men as well as women.
As was already mentioned in detail, will be determined through the religions of this world, above all through the religious thinking, that women of the man's world indeed as lovable, fundamentally however looked at as second-classed, whereby the female Wesen automatically pertains to weaker and lower. This is for thousands of years already so, whereby the woman slowly but surely could be in every wise disadvantaged and suppressed by the man's world.
Her natural equality, the nature-caused equivalence and her laws of nature equal rights were to her systematically arranged and to such an extent eliminated, that she began paradoxically, to proclaim herself in the religions and in the life as lowest life form of human form. A fact, that is to be recognized by the army of women that still always swearing to the Pope and Christian teachings as well as other woman-discriminating religions. Still always so many Christian and others-religious communities are to be found, in which the women before god and the men have to veil their head in submissive form under a headscarf: women and girls, who often without criticism and without resistance, submissively and belief-oriented accept this, because this after all is thus demanded by 'holy scriptures' or by the men.
The new time brings it now eventually evolution-law-based with itself, that themselves the slowly awaking, Intellectual thinking, inquiring and seeking women of this world gradually understandingly rebel against this ausgeartete, demeaning and malicious enslavement by the religions and by the man's world. Unfortunately this brings for the women however often with itself, that they in their fairness (intellect + rationality + logic)-demanding awaking make an un-understanding and unknowing effort around their natural rights of the equality and the equal rights. Then it comes, that they wrongly look at these concerns and they wrongly place themselves against the long suppressing man's world, whereby it unfortunately often only reaps further aggressions and suppressions.
The women themselves by the same token like the men are no more conscious of the natural laws and recommendations, the natural consonance, the equality, equivalence and equal duties. The women became deprived of this knowledge consciously by the men, guides, rulers, governing ones, the proclaimers of religion and advocates of religion. Thus the women stand therefore at the evolution-demanding present time demanding equality and equal rights, those they are not capable of extracting understanding of. Often in complete unknowledge around the natural truth, they transform consequently into euphoric wishes of emancipation of pure-worldly values, not-understanding, that the emancipation itself must focus on the equality in the value of the human beings and thereby thus also on the equivalence of the genders and their rights and duties as well as on all values and forms of the responsibility. Therefore many women even attempt in their unknowledgeness around this concern, to force themselves into the language of an emancipation and therein to bring to fruition, whereby create an absolute unlogicalness and senselessness in language and text. Many modified terms and specifications of the language, which are normally gender-neutral, therefore in the wrong emancipation-like ununderstanding will be interpreted as the man assigns.
If namely by the women a pure worldly equal rights are pursued, which ignores the equal rights and equivalence of the men, then this means, that new gender wars and various terribleness of new forms will be unleashed over the world.
Unexpected and completely new terribleness can result from this, because such a one-sided emancipation-development must inevitably create and set free new negative powers, which empirically can only end in the ruin and with destruction. Therefore wisely to strive for by the women a nature-law-based equality and equal rights in equivalence with the men, as this is given through the laws of nature and through these an example is set. If that is not however the accomplished effect or acted contrary to, then breaks out again in a new form chaos over the world, how it for thousands of years is already common through the self-centeredness and one's own authority of the man's world, because also the man's world itself not aligned after the equality, but rather itself absolutely arrogantly has itself selected, feels and accordingly acts as highest life form. If therefore the women follow the bad example of the man's world, then the two powers very quickly and vehemently collide and cast the world into the absolute and unalterable depravity. Therefore the men and the women must hence in their mutual evolution find their equality, equal rights and equivalence and absolutely equally-strive to be around each other. Only in this natural kind and wise can the fulfillment of the equality and equal rights be achieved, and only thereby can man and woman law-based in every respect collectively be on an equal level. Also the man requires through the assistance of the woman the emancipation for equality, equal rights and equivalence, because he already neglects and has lost everything through his thinking and actions in his imperiousness as ausgeartete and Gewalt-ruling leader already for thousands of years.
If in the new time is called on for emancipation at all levels of the human community, and indeed both in legal as also in sociological realms, then this can only collectively be fulfilled, precisely only by man and woman together. Both namely require in equal measure the evolution and the necessity for the fulfillment. Both, man as well as woman, still have very much to learn and to re-learn.
The women have to liberate themselves from their one's own captivity and from the thousand-year-old abasement by the man, while the man has to liberate himself from his captivity of his ausgearteten thinking as well as from his pathological cravings to rule and for might, his imperiousness, self-weakening and creating of unequality.
It is to wish for the women of this world, that they truly again find the way back to their Creation-law-based femaleness; that they are guided by their maternal essence of wisdom and will not commit the same errors, as the men for thousands of years have committed to them. And it is to be hoped, that the women (Frauen) are intelligent, that they make as woman (Weib) their name as 'bearing one' all honor, and indeed that honor, which the original word-value corresponds to 'source of the life' or 'bearing one (vessel) of the life', thus again in love and harmony the equality, equal rights and equivalence is given between man and woman (Frau), thus how the nature sets an example of it since time immemorial and requires from the human beings.
English translation from the original German text by Patrick McKnight and may contain errors - 1-August-2016 | English translation © Creational Truth 2011-2020